When you start investing, one of the first choices you’re likely to face is whether to take an active or passive route. The conversation around active vs passive investing can feel more complicated than it needs to be, often framed as a competition rather than a personal decision.
Strip away the noise, and it really comes down to how involved you want to be, how comfortable you are with ups and downs and what you expect your money to do for you over time.
Understanding the strengths and limits of each approach puts you in a far better position to invest with confidence, rather than relying on headlines or short-term results.
What Is Active Investment Management?
Active investment management is exactly what it says on the tin: investors or fund managers make ongoing decisions about what to buy, what to sell and when to make changes.
Rather than following a market index, the aim is to select investments that could outperform or to protect capital when conditions look uncertain.
Active managers analyse company finances, economic data and market trends. They may increase exposure to certain sectors, reduce risk by holding cash or move away from areas they believe are overpriced.
In some strategies, active management may help manage downside risk during periods of uncertainty, although outcomes depend heavily on the fund’s mandate, investment process and costs.
In this situation, flexibility is often seen as a key attraction.
Potential benefits of active investment management include:
- The ability to respond to changing market conditions
- Selective risk management during periods of volatility
- The chance to add value through skilled judgement
That said, active management comes with trade-offs. Fees tend to be higher due to the research and decision-making involved, and results can vary widely. Some managers add value after costs, while many struggle to do so consistently over the long term.
What Is Passive Investment Management?
Passive investment management is about keeping things simple. Funds track the market as it is, instead of trying to outguess it, often by following indices like the FTSE 100. With fewer decisions and less trading involved, costs tend to be lower.
Passive funds often trade less frequently, which can reduce tax friction in taxable accounts. For many UK investors, though, the biggest influence on tax efficiency is the use of wrappers such as ISAs or pensions, where income and capital gains are sheltered regardless of whether a fund is active or passive.
Common advantages of passive investing include:
- Lower ongoing charges
- Broad diversification from the outset
- Clear alignment with long-term market returns
However, passive funds track the market and rise and fall with it. There is no downside protection built in and no ability to move away from struggling sectors. In falling markets, passive investors experience the downturn in full, which can test patience and resolve.
Performance, Costs and Real-World Results
Much of the active vs passive investing debate centres around performance.
Long-term studies comparing active funds with their benchmarks can often find that, after fees, a significant proportion underperform over extended periods. Costs matter, and even small differences can compound significantly.
That doesn’t mean active management has no place; outcomes vary by market, time period, and investment style. In less efficient parts of the market, or during periods of rapid change, skilled managers may justify their higher fees. The challenge is identifying them in advance and sticking with them through quieter spells.
As with any investment approach, past performance isn’t a reliable guide to future returns.
Passive strategies, by contrast, deliver market returns at a low cost. They remove manager selection risk, but they also eliminate the possibility of outperforming the index. For many investors, this trade-off is perfectly acceptable, especially when combined with a long-term mindset.
Choosing What Fits You Best
There is no single “right” answer when it comes to active vs passive investing. The better question is which approach fits you.
You might lean towards active management if you value judgement, are comfortable paying higher fees for potential flexibility and prefer knowing someone is actively monitoring risk.
Passive investing may suit you if you prefer simplicity, cost control, and are comfortable accepting market returns without intervention.
Many investors end up using both. A blended approach can combine low-cost passive funds for core exposure, alongside selective active strategies where judgement may add value.
How Informed Financial Planning Can Help
Deciding between active and passive investing is rarely just about performance charts or fees by themselves. It’s about how each approach fits within your wider financial picture, including your goals, time horizon, tax position and tolerance for uncertainty.
At Informed Financial Planning, we don’t start with a preference for active or passive strategies. Instead, we focus on goal-based planning, looking at what you want your money to achieve and how comfortable you are along the way. A low-cost passive core makes sense for some clients, while for others, selective active management plays a valuable role. However, very often, it’s a combination of both.
By taking a long-term view and keeping decisions grounded in evidence rather than noise, we help clients build portfolios that feel aligned with their lives, not just the markets. The aim isn’t to chase short-term wins, but to put together an approach you can stick with through all weathers.
Where to Go Next
If you’re weighing up active vs passive investing and wondering how it applies to your own situation, a personalised conversation often brings the most clarity.
If you need a little bit of an Investment Basics refresher before looking into this further, you can check out our blog here.
However, if you’re feeling ready, get in touch to discuss how IFP can help!
The value of investments and any income from them can fall as well as rise and you may not get back the original amount invested.
Some links will make you leave the website of Informed Financial Planning and view the content of an external website. Informed Financial Planning cannot be held responsible for the content of external websites.
